On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 10:55 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 01/17/2012 05:07 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds<torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > [bwh: Backport to 2.6.32 - ENOIOCTLCMD does not get converted to > > ENOTTY, so we must return ENOTTY directly] > > Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings<ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Have you tested 32-on-64? I already did this change in the version for > 3.2 stable, but sd_compat_ioctl has to keep ENOIOCTLCMD: Not specifically... > > [ Cherry picked from 3ed4e7ba4be8c72051d87dcb2dec279d97a18d41 > > > > Changes with respect to 3.3: return -ENOTTY from scsi_verify_blk_ioctl > > and -ENOIOCTLCMD from sd_compat_ioctl. ] But in 2.6.32, compat_sys_ioctl will end up returning EINVAL rather than ENOTTY for an unhandled ioctl number. Also, since we're denying ioctls for security reasons rather than because we don't know how to handle them, I don't think there's any harm in doing this. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings When in doubt, use brute force. - Ken Thompson
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
