A statement such as
struct iscsi_node_attrib *na = na = iscsit_tpg_get_node_attrib(sess);
has undefined behaviour since there are two assignments to 'na', strictly
speaking (the order in which side-effects from the assignments take place
is undefined since there's no intervening sequence point), and it looks
unintentional in any case.
Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_erl1.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
compile tested only.
diff --git a/drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_erl1.c b/drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_erl1.c
index 101b1be..af18cb8 100644
--- a/drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_erl1.c
+++ b/drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_erl1.c
@@ -1238,7 +1238,7 @@ void iscsit_mod_dataout_timer(struct iscsi_cmd *cmd)
{
struct iscsi_conn *conn = cmd->conn;
struct iscsi_session *sess = conn->sess;
- struct iscsi_node_attrib *na = na = iscsit_tpg_get_node_attrib(sess);
+ struct iscsi_node_attrib *na = iscsit_tpg_get_node_attrib(sess);
spin_lock_bh(&cmd->dataout_timeout_lock);
if (!(cmd->dataout_timer_flags & ISCSI_TF_RUNNING)) {
@@ -1261,7 +1261,7 @@ void iscsit_start_dataout_timer(
struct iscsi_conn *conn)
{
struct iscsi_session *sess = conn->sess;
- struct iscsi_node_attrib *na = na = iscsit_tpg_get_node_attrib(sess);
+ struct iscsi_node_attrib *na = iscsit_tpg_get_node_attrib(sess);
if (cmd->dataout_timer_flags & ISCSI_TF_RUNNING)
return;
--
1.7.8.3
--
Jesper Juhl <jj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> http://www.chaosbits.net/
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
