Re: [PATCH block:for-3.3/core] block: disable ELEVATOR_INSERT_SORT_MERGE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 20:38 -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 8:19 PM, Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> For detailed discussion of the bug:
> >>
> >>  http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.next/20064/focus=20159
> >>
> > this is overkill. when plug is added, we found huge performance
> > regression, that's why we add INSERT_SORT_MERGE.
> 
> With what workload? I suspect most of the improvements is from merging
> across different cfqqs, no? The whole recursive thing can't be very
> useful if cross-cfqq merging isn't allowed. Maybe there are specific
> cases where last_merge hint merging can be specially effective. I
> don't know. Regardless, this is an apparent bug and the block tree
> will be pushed mainline pretty soon. If necessary, fix it better
> later. Doing complex things inside merge window usually isn't a good
> idea.
it's not related to the recursive merge. I forgot the detail of the
workload why we add INSERT_SORT_MERGE, it's added several months ago
anyway.
Obviously we shouldn't do complex things inside the merge window. I just
didn't agree to disable INSERT_SORT_MERGE, which will bring performance
regression for sure. Can we just change CFQ like your first path?

Thanks,
Shaohua

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux