Re: 3.2-rc2+: Reported regressions from 3.0 and 3.1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 09:59:18PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> grr, nothing in that patch's changelog indicates that it fixed a
> regression nor that it fixed an infinite blockage of suspend.

Well it's not a recent thing so I didn't flag it as a regression. It
doesn't infinite block it, suspend works fine almost all the time (or
it would have been noticed before), and if you've bad luck and it
doesn't suspend the first time around like someone experienced, if you
try again a bit later it'll work.

> I moved it to my 3.2 queue, thanks.

Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux