Re: [PATCH block/for-next] block: don't call blk_drain_queue() if elevator is not up

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 7:28 AM, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hmmm... yeah, the first and second patchsets kinda go together but
>> well the first one definitely is pretty good bug fix without others,
>> so I guess that split isn't too bad either. Alright, no objection.
>
> OK, I'll push off what I have now and then we can queue #2 up shortly. I
> would probably prefer pushing the cfq locking cleanup to 3.3 to get some
> more testing time on that, but it all depends on what your level of
> confidence in it is?

Not that confident. Those definitely belong to the next window.

Thank you.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux