RE: scsi scan

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> -----Original Message-----
> From: KY Srinivasan
> Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2011 7:47 PM
> To: linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; james.bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: scsi scan
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: KY Srinivasan
> > Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2011 6:52 PM
> > To: KY Srinivasan; linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > james.bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: RE: scsi scan
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: K. Y. Srinivasan [mailto:kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > > Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2011 4:29 PM
> > > To: linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; james.bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > > hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; KY Srinivasan
> > > Subject: scsi scan
> > >
> > > James,
> > >
> > > On the Windows host they allow hot add/remove of block devices attached
> to
> > > the scsi controller(s) assigned to the guest.
> > > So, when a hot add/remove event occurs, the host sends a message to the
> > guest
> > > that something has changed on the hba and
> > > the guest is responsible for figuring out what has changed: a) Setup state to
> > > manage new devices that may have been added
> > > and b) get rid of devices that may have been removed. As I look at
> > implementing
> > > this functionality for Linux guests,
> > > I would need to be able to do a scan on the hba under question and deal only
> > > with whatever has changed.
> > > Is this something that the scsi core supports or would I need to roll out a
> version
> > > of scan that would ignore
> > > devices already scanned (except for the remove case) and properly add new
> > > devices that may be found.
> > > Any guidance here would be greatly appreciated.
> >
> > I see that the re-scan is correctly done through sysfs by writing
> > the string "- - -" to the scan file under /sys/class/scsi_host/*/scan.
> 
> I wish the function scsi_scan_host_selected() were an exported function.
> This would address the problem I have here. Is there a reason for not
> exporting this function.

Looks like I can use scsi_scan_target() to do what I need to do.

K. Y

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux