Re: Do we need to implement sr START/STOP management

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 01:13:16PM -0400, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
> Do you mean the GET EVENT STATUS NOTIFICATION command (as there is
> no CHECK MEDIA EVENT STATUS command in SCSI or ATA)? If so it is
> one of the "good guys" along with the REQUEST SENSE command. And
> as I said TUR is not recommended. So looking at MS usage _and_
> the standards is a useful guide.

Yes, that's the one.  Sorry, I always get confused about its name.
IIRC, it's a relatively new command, right?  Anyways, I'm not arguing
standards are useless but that actual usages have to take precedence.

> I agree. SCSI and ATA define idle states (with some fuzziness in
> the naming) that have timers associated with them. Those
> mechanisms seem to work pretty well without the intervention of
> commands like START STOP UNIT.

Cool, thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux