[PATCH 2/4] libfc: fix checking FC_TYPE_BLS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Vasu Dev <vasu.dev@xxxxxxxxx>

Its checked after skb freed, so instead have fh_type
cached and then check FC_TYPE_BLS against cached
fh_type value.

This wrong check was causing double exch locking as
reported by Bhanu at
https://lists.open-fcoe.org/pipermail/devel/2011-October/011793.html

Signed-off-by: Vasu Dev <vasu.dev@xxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Bhanu Prakash Gollapudi <bprakash@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Yi Zou <yi.zou@xxxxxxxxx>
---

 drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_exch.c |    3 ++-
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_exch.c b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_exch.c
index 7c055fd..81235f3 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_exch.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_exch.c
@@ -469,6 +469,7 @@ static int fc_seq_send(struct fc_lport *lport, struct fc_seq *sp,
 	struct fc_frame_header *fh = fc_frame_header_get(fp);
 	int error;
 	u32 f_ctl;
+	u8 fh_type = fh->fh_type;
 
 	ep = fc_seq_exch(sp);
 	WARN_ON((ep->esb_stat & ESB_ST_SEQ_INIT) != ESB_ST_SEQ_INIT);
@@ -493,7 +494,7 @@ static int fc_seq_send(struct fc_lport *lport, struct fc_seq *sp,
 	 */
 	error = lport->tt.frame_send(lport, fp);
 
-	if (fh->fh_type == FC_TYPE_BLS)
+	if (fh_type == FC_TYPE_BLS)
 		return error;
 
 	/*

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux