Re: ib_srpt status

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 18:43 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 09:41:15AM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > I'm having no problems with the patch posted for v3.2 review on MT26428
> > HCAs
> > 
> > Can you verify you are actually using this patch, and not your private
> > tree from github..?  The reason is that your tree did not contain the
> > bugfix below to ib_srpt code that was originally causing problems:
> > 
> > ib_srpt: Fix bug with chainged SGLs in srpt_map_sg_to_ib_sge
> > http://www.risingtidesystems.com/git/?p=lio-core-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=ea485147563b6555a97dbf811825fbb586519252
> 
> Also it would be useful to know the workload that causes the corruption.

>From the above commit:

This patch fixes a bug in srpt_map_sg_to_ib_sge() that assumed a single
contigious array of struct scatterlist.  This was causing a OOPs when
se_cmd->t_task->t_tasks_no > 1 was using a set of sg_chained struct
se_task->task_sg[] memory into srpt_map_sg_to_ib_sge() code.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux