>From the original author yes, (unless he's dead or something like that). Not from someone else, when the original author is available. When have your had a patch of yours being re-spun and submitted from someone else? Please point to a marc.info thread. ----- Original Message ----- > From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: Luben Tuikov <ltuikov@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Mark Salyzyn <mark_salyzyn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; James Bottomley <jbottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Darrick Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>; Xiangliang Yu <yuxiangl@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Jack Wang <jack_wang@xxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 10:03 AM > Subject: Re: [PATCH] [SCSI] libsas: Allow expander T-T attachments > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 09:35:19AM -0700, Luben Tuikov wrote: >> Salyzyn, DON'T do this any more with mine or anybody else's > patches. OKAY? > > Respinning patches to fix whitespace issues is perfectly fine. What > Marc missed, and what is very important is to preserve the proper > attribution of the original author. That is usually done by keeping a > copy of the original From: line as the first line in the mail body. > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
