On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 12:52 AM, James Bottomley <jbottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 21:19 -0700, Luben Tuikov wrote: >> Allow expander table-to-table attachments for >> expanders that support it. > > This is half the code to do SAS 2.0 expanders. You seem to have > additions from the other half (self configuring expanders) see below; > does this mean you have a patch for self configuring expanders in the > works? I'd like to see that as well, but in the meantime support for the other SAS-2 fields does not block basic operation like the lack of table-to-table support does. Can we also tag this for -stable? It's akin to a pci device id update in terms of impact. Acked-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
