Re: [BUG] scsi: hpsa: how to destroy your files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 11:50:38 -0700
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 10:58 -0700, Roland Dreier wrote:
> > > OK I found the bad commit,I got lucky... I lost some files but my
> > > machine was able to complete the bisection. CC involved people
> > 
> > > # bad: [b03e7495a862b028294f59fc87286d6d78ee7fa1] PCI: Set PCI-E Max Payload Size on fabric
> > 
> > Hi Eric,
> > 
> > I guess it would be useful to see "lspci -vv" output with a "good" kernel
> > and with that bad patch applied.  Most likely we should see some difference
> > somewhere in the MaxPayload fields in the PCI Express capability of
> > some device.
> > 
> > Either the RAID controller or something else lies, and puts a value
> > in the DevCap that it can't actually support, or else the patch is
> > buggy and puts something out of range in a DevCtl somewhere.
> 
> 
> While we investigate, I think the problems produced by the patch (data
> corruption) are serious enough to warrant reverting it, please Jesse.

Yep, I just got another report about it today too, I'll queue the
revert.

-- 
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux