On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 00:43 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 00:09:40 -0700 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Just a simple
> >
> > #define DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(ll,d) \
> > ({ unsigned long long _tmp = (ll)+(d)-1; do_div(_tmp, d); _tmp; })
> >
> > looks like it would work and be simpler. Avoid the conditional, do the
> > same "add 'd-1' thing as the regular ROUND_UP().
> >
>
> We might end up needing a DIV_ROUND_UP_SECTOR_T because that guy's
> type/size is Kconfigurable.
>
> otoh DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL won't have many callsites - the occasional
> conversion from UL to ULL then back to UL wouldn't kill us. Unless
> there be subtle problems with such a conversion.
>
Makes sense to me, and sending out updated series.. Anything else to
consider here folks before pushing into target-pending.git/for-next..?
Thanks!
--nab
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
