Re: [PATCH 3/3] PM: Limit race conditions between runtime PM and system sleep

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 28 Jun 2011, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> On Tuesday, June 28, 2011, Ming Lei wrote:
> > 
> > Hi Rafael,
> > 
> > On Sun, 26 Jun 2011 00:56:31 +0200
> > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > > Index: linux-2.6/Documentation/power/runtime_pm.txt
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- linux-2.6.orig/Documentation/power/runtime_pm.txt
> > > +++ linux-2.6/Documentation/power/runtime_pm.txt
> > > @@ -567,6 +567,11 @@ this is:
> > >  	pm_runtime_set_active(dev);
> > >  	pm_runtime_enable(dev);
> > >  
> > > +The PM core always increments the run-time usage counter before calling the
> > > +->suspend() callback and decrements it after calling the ->resume() callback.
> > > +Hence disabling run-time PM temporarily like this will not cause any run-time
> > > +suspend callbacks to be lost.
> > 
> > Could you explain why the above is that "this will not cause any run-time suspend
> > callbacks to be lost"? 
> > 
> > Looks like it should be "this will not cause any run-time suspend callbacks to
> > be called", but not sure.
> 
> You're right the wording is not perfect.  The problem is that if it's done
> this way without incrementing the usage counter beforehand, the status may
> change to "suspended" right before the pm_runtime_set_active() and then the
> new status will not reflect the actual state of the device.
> 
> So, it may be better to say "Hence disabling runtime PM temporarily like this
> will not cause the runtime PM status of the device to conflict with the actual
> device state".
> 
> Alan, what do you think?

How about: "... will not cause any runtime suspend attempts to be 
permanently lost.  If the usage count goes to zero following the return 
of the ->resume() callback, the ->runtime_idle() callback will be 
invoked as usual."

Alan Stern

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux