On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 05:13:22PM +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> wrote: > > Given that we pretty well tested and working code that's used in lots > > of production setups my vote is for taking it as-is unless someone can > > actually show a prototype for a nicely working user/kernel split. > > As far as I know such a user/kernel split has been implemented in both > IET and SCST and is working fine in both of these projects. Which are unrelated codebases - if you want to offer a competing iSCSI implementation for the core target framework we have in mainline based on the codebase go ahead. > And here is another issue that still hasn't been resolved yet: > http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=129707890023739&w=2. This is related to the software iSCSI fronted in what way? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
