On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 12:40 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 6:18 AM, Nicholas A. Bellinger > <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The srpt_port->port_wwn patch in question does > > current ensure that sport->enabled has been set via an configfs > > attribute at: > > > > /sys/kernel/config/target/srpt/$IB_PORT_GUID/tpgt_1/enable > > > > and will reject all SRP login attempts to an individual struct srpt_port > > until the attribute has been explictly triggered. > > > > This allows ib_srpt to follow what is expected by rtsadmin-v2 + > > lio-utils, and used to generate /etc/target/srpt_start.sh used to save > > persistent fabric configuration. Currently other fabrics like > > iscsi-target and tcm_qla2xxx expect to be able to reject fabric login > > requests before the full set of WWPN endpoints, LUNs, NodeACLs + > > MappedLUNs have been recreated during an typical init.d/target start > > operation. > > > > I think it makes sense to do the same for the SRPT control plane on an > > individual HCA port GUID basis as long as there are no underlying fabric > > issues, and that Roland is happy. In terms of supporting more than one > > type of /sys/kernel/config/target/srpt/$WWPN/$TPGT/ layout, I would > > really like to avoid this for mainline code unless there is a really > > good reason.. > > I'm still wondering whether it was a good idea to switch from ib<n> > style names to port GIDs. Not only will that make it hard for users to > match the ib<n> names already assigned to InfiniBand HCAs with target > port names but this also deviates from the naming scheme used for any > other Linux device. Ethernet devices e.g. appear as eth<n> in /dev > instead of a MAC address like 00:1a:64:10:18:6f. > So from the user perspective in rtsadmin/rtslib, the Port GUIDs are automatically presented in long-form after being extracted and parsed from /sys/class/infiniband/*/ports/*/gids/0 input via ib_srpt.spec here: http://www.linux-iscsi.org/wiki/SCSI_RDMA_Protocol/RTSadmin#Specification_file The available IB Port GUIs appear as <TAB> completable input in /ib_srpt/ during a 'create wwn=' operation shown here: http://www.linux-iscsi.org/wiki/SCSI_RDMA_Protocol/RTSadmin#Configuration There is no reason why we can't present a more verbose informational display based on individual available HW fabric WWPNs. Eg: things like HW port status information, driver, firmware rev, etc.. So aside from the user side of things, I think using a IB Port GUID makes more sense to ensure that /sys/kernel/config/target/srpt/ configuration does not depend upon the ordering of symbolic HCA names in /sys/class/infiniband/, which AFAIK are not guarenteed to be persistent as HCAs are added/removed from the system. Ensuring that we can reference target fabric WWPNs using an underlying HW reference instead of a symbolic name is important for this reason, and is currently how other HW target mode drivers including tcm_fc(openfcoe) currently function. Thanks, --nab -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html