On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 16:45 -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > James: > > Your commit 3dea642afd9187728d119fce5c82a7ed9faa9b6a ([SCSI] Revert > "[SCSI] Retrieve the Caching mode page") hasn't been submitted for the > 2.6.38 stable tree. More people are now getting hit with the > underlying problem; see > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35042 OK, yes, the reversion needs sending to stable ... can you do that? > Do you want to queue your commit to the stable tree, or do you prefer > to wait until the proper repair patch: > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=130089710431684&w=2 > > has been merged so it can go into the stable tree instead? > > Alan Stern > > P.S.: As of now, the scsi-next tree doesn't show any signs of > reinstating Luben's original commit together with my repair patch. > Does this mean you intend to forget about the original "Retrieve the > Caching mode page" change, or do you intend to merge them for 2.6.41?) Actually, no, I was waiting for you to send the combined patch (with both signoffs) rather than having me reconstruct it. James -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
