On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 20:41 -0700, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
>
> The rcu callback fc_rport_free_rcu() just calls a kfree(),
> so we use kfree_rcu() instead of the call_rcu(fc_rport_free_rcu).
>
> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_rport.c | 14 +-------------
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_rport.c b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_rport.c
> index a7175ad..29abab0 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_rport.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_rport.c
> @@ -151,18 +151,6 @@ static struct fc_rport_priv *fc_rport_create(struct fc_lport *lport,
> }
>
> /**
> - * fc_rport_free_rcu() - Free a remote port
> - * @rcu: The rcu_head structure inside the remote port
> - */
> -static void fc_rport_free_rcu(struct rcu_head *rcu)
> -{
> - struct fc_rport_priv *rdata;
> -
> - rdata = container_of(rcu, struct fc_rport_priv, rcu);
> - kfree(rdata);
> -}
> -
> -/**
> * fc_rport_destroy() - Free a remote port after last reference is released
> * @kref: The remote port's kref
> */
> @@ -171,7 +159,7 @@ static void fc_rport_destroy(struct kref *kref)
> struct fc_rport_priv *rdata;
>
> rdata = container_of(kref, struct fc_rport_priv, kref);
> - call_rcu(&rdata->rcu, fc_rport_free_rcu);
> + kfree_rcu(rdata, rcu);
I think this last line should be:
kfree_rcu(rdata, &rdata->rcu);
Thanks, //Rob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
