On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 19:28:41 -0700 "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 09:32 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > > On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 17:26:17 -0700 > > "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 08:55 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > > > > On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 16:50:14 -0700 > > > > "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 08:20 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 16:24:58 -0500 > > > > > > Brian King <brking@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If could send along the original misconfigured configfs layout that is > > > > > > > > causing the OOPs in handle_crq(), I would be happy to have a quick look. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here it is. As you can see, there is no ./target/ibmvscsis directory created. In order > > > > > > > > > > > > I suspect something like that. The driver can't crash with any > > > > > > configurations though. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to get it to work, I did the following. Please let me know if there is a better way > > > > > > > to do this... > > > > > > > > > > > > As I said long before, this kinda hardware configuration should > > > > > > automatically show up when we load the driver module. But the target > > > > > > core is broken in this regard. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's possible to move the I_T nexus creation into VIO context code, but > > > > > we still want to be able to define the actual target endpoint definition > > > > > from userspace to get the proper VFS reference counting for fabric data > > > > > structures containing struct config_group that reference the > > > > > config_groups from the rest of the target stack. > > > > > > > > Hmm, what can we configure for the ibmvscsis? I think that there is > > > > nothing. Everything is configured via the firmware before the kernel > > > > boots. So I don't see any point to configure something from the user > > > > space. That just wastes user's time like Brian. > > > > -- > > > > > > Yes, but the user still needs to configure the fabric Port/LUNs in order > > > to build the the view of the target backends, right..? > > > > As I said before, there is no 'Port' to configure for the ibmvscsis. > > > > So only LUNs. But before confuging LUNs, the target should work, that > > is, telling an initiator that there is no LUNs. > > Ok, this is where I was getting originally confused, thank you for the > clarification. > > Then we should be able to do something like this together with earlier > patch to handle reporting no available LUNs because "target endpoint has > not been configured. I will revist my patch from this afternoon to fix > up the REPORT_LUNs emulation to allow this, and error out in > ibmvscsis.c:tcm_queuecommand() and send out in proper form to review. > > > > > > In this particular case for ibmvscsis since we already know the target > > > endpoint names from sysfs attributes, using a small amount of scripting > > > code in lio-utils to automatically setup the endpoints for the user is > > > really simple, and we still expect the user to define which backend > > > devices from /sys/kernel/config/target/$HBA/$DEV will be configured as > > > Port/LUNs for the fabric endpoint. > > > > Why does users bother to run the script? We know that the kernel can > > configure everything to make the target work. > > The type of script is an example of driving the typical configuration > layout for normal usage (eg: with TCM backends). For a HW target mode > case like with w/ ibmvscsis, the user should be presented with a list of > available backends and un-configured target HW fabric endpoints You are still confused. Nothing to configure about fabric endpoints for ibmvscsis. I've not used the script. I don't want. The hardware information needs to show up automatically. You are against it? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html