On Tue, 2011-03-15 at 18:52 -0700, James Bottomley wrote: > On Tue, 2011-03-15 at 16:57 -0700, Robert Love wrote: > > From: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxx> > > Cc: Robert Love <robert.w.love@xxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Cc: devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > You can junk the cc's; they're mostly annotations for git-send-email > > > Acked-by: Robert Love <robert.w.love@xxxxxxxxx> > > And this has to be Signed-off-by not Acked-by. The reason is that > you've resent the patch (and altered it as you transmitted it) so that > makes you part of the signoff chain. If you ack a patch, it means I can > pick it up from source and you as maintainer didn't actually touch it. > Thanks for the clarification James. Signed-off-by: Robert Love <robert.w.love@xxxxxxxxx> Let me know if you, or anyone else, wants me to resend the patch with the Signed-off line. //Rob -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html