Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 02:09:18AM CET, robert.w.love@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 01:55 -0800, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Or perhaps this should be applied to net-next?
>>
>I think this should go through scsi-misc as all the other
>libfc/libfcoe/fcoe patches do.
>
>> Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 07:05:35AM CET, jpirko@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> >Check for bonding master and refuse to use that.
>> >
>> >Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> >---
>> > drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c | 4 +---
>> > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> >
>> >diff --git a/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c b/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c
>> >index 9f9600b..3becc6a 100644
>> >--- a/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c
>> >+++ b/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c
>> >@@ -285,9 +285,7 @@ static int fcoe_interface_setup(struct fcoe_interface *fcoe,
>> > }
>> >
>> > /* Do not support for bonding device */
>> >- if ((netdev->priv_flags & IFF_MASTER_ALB) ||
>> >- (netdev->priv_flags & IFF_SLAVE_INACTIVE) ||
>> >- (netdev->priv_flags & IFF_MASTER_8023AD)) {
>> >+ if (netdev->priv_flags & IFF_BONDING && netdev->flags & IFF_MASTER) {
>> > FCOE_NETDEV_DBG(netdev, "Bonded interfaces not supported\n");
>> > return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> > }
>> >--
>> >1.7.3.4
>> >
>
>James, feel free to pick up this patch. I don't have anything in my fcoe
>tree right now that it would conflict with. I'll also put it in my tree
>and resend if you don't put it into scsi-misc directly.
What's the status of this? Maybe this should rather go thru net-next
Davem?
Thanks
Jirka
>
>Acked-by: Robert Love <robert.w.love@xxxxxxxxx>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
