On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 15:13 -0600, Brian King wrote: > On 02/10/2011 01:38 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 13:15 -0600, Brian King wrote: > >> On 02/10/2011 06:21 AM, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > > > > Hi Brian, > > > > <SNIP> > > > >>> + > >>> +static int ibmvscsis_new_cmd_map(struct se_cmd *se_cmd) > >>> +{ > >>> + struct ibmvscsis_cmnd *cmd = > >>> + container_of(se_cmd, struct ibmvscsis_cmnd, se_cmd); > >>> + struct scsi_cmnd *sc = &cmd->sc; > >>> + struct iu_entry *iue = (struct iu_entry *)sc->SCp.ptr; > >>> + struct srp_cmd *scmd = iue->sbuf->buf; > >>> + int ret; > >>> + > >>> + /* > >>> + * Allocate the necessary tasks to complete the received CDB+data > >>> + */ > >>> + ret = transport_generic_allocate_tasks(se_cmd, scmd->cdb); > >>> + if (ret == -1) { > >>> + /* Out of Resources */ > >>> + return PYX_TRANSPORT_LU_COMM_FAILURE; > >>> + } else if (ret == -2) { > >>> + /* > >>> + * Handle case for SAM_STAT_RESERVATION_CONFLICT > >>> + */ > >>> + if (se_cmd->se_cmd_flags & SCF_SCSI_RESERVATION_CONFLICT) > >>> + return PYX_TRANSPORT_RESERVATION_CONFLICT; > >> > >> Does this imply the driver supports scsi reservations? If it supports SCSI-2 reservations, > >> there is a capability that could be set in the capabilities MAD to advertise this > >> fact such that it can be used by the client. > >> > > > > Absoulutely, the target core struct se_device backends being serviced as > > VSCSI LUN would normally return SCSI-3 from INQUIRY data, and support > > the full set of persistent reservations and CRH=1 (Compatible > > Reservations Handling) in drivers/target/target_core_pr.c code. > > > > Also, we are able to explictly limit individual struct se_device > > backends to disable PR and only use the older SCSI-2 reservations, but I > > don't think we have a way to do this on a fabric module wide basis just > > yet. > > > > Is this something we should be doing for this code..? > > Disregard my previous comment. It looks like current client should handle reservations > just fine without any further changes. So is that an ack for putting this in scsi-misc ... or did you want to do more testing first? James -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html