Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC] Sparseness in storage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11-02-02 09:23 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 12:07:23PM -0500, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
are improving their sparseness handling as well, with Linux
playing "catch up" to NTFS in this regard (e.g. the new
FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE flag in fallocate() ).

FYI: XFS has supported hole punching for more than 15 years, although
the first years obviously were't on Linux.

I was looking at the Windows API yesterday and you need
to check each volume for sparse support. So it is file
system dependent there as well: VFAT doesn't support
sparseness and NTFS (version ?) does.

From the perspective of user space tools, POSIX support
for sparseness would be helpful and FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE
looks like a step in that direction.

Doug Gilbert

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux