Re: [PATCH 3/3] target: Minor sparse warning fixes and annotations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 13:33 -0800, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 14:56 -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 12:37 -0800, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > > -#define TASK_CMD(task) ((struct se_cmd *)task->task_se_cmd)
> > > -#define TASK_DEV(task) ((struct se_device *)task->se_dev)
> > > +#define TASK_CMD(task) ((task)->task_se_cmd)
> > > +#define TASK_DEV(task) ((task)->se_dev)
> > 
> > If sparse is objecting to things like this then sparse needs fixing:
> > It's decreasing typesafety.  the things being cast are void * ... they'd
> > be depositable into any pointer whatsoever without the cast.  With the
> > cast in the #define, we pick up pointer mismatches (as we should).
> > Without it, we don't.  As long as the define is always a specific type,
> > it *should* cast to it.
> > 
> 
> Hmmm, good point..  In that case I will go ahead and drop this part of
> the patch.

Actually, I misspoke on this.  They're not void *; they're defined as
struct pointers ... so the cast is actually a spurious double cast.  As
long as the rest are, I'm fine with this.

James


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux