>> Okay, I moved EH scheduling to ata_qc_issue(). But since now START >> taskfile is >> created in ata_eh_maybe_verify() I do not see why the same code has to >> remain in ata_scsi_start_stop_xlat. Does it make sense? > > The taskfile you are to pass to the hardware is created in > atapi_start_stop_xlat(), so you should not create a new taskfile in > ata_eh_maybe_verify() > I can only see that the taskfile is being created in ata_scsi_translate(). I want START request to return immediately, so I need to schedule a deferred execution. Do you suggest I create a new work_struct for this purpose (something like link->spinup_task)? If I do that, I do not need to use ata_port_schedule_eh() at all. Thanks, Maksim. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
