chetan loke, on 12/18/2010 10:13 PM wrote: > On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 4:35 PM, Vladislav Bolkhovitin <vst@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> In this regard it looks to be a good idea to freeze accepting both LIO >> and SCST until the end of the next year and then choose one with the >> biggest activity in the related mailing lists, not counting me and >> NicholasB. > > Why wait till the end of the next year? What I proposed earlier was > 'to review at the architecture level'. If folks don't agree to it then > this email drama will never > stop. Once the review starts we can decide on a common baseline to > benchmark both the stacks. I'm more than willing to test/benchmark > ESX(front-end)/SCST/LIO(back-end) combo. I'm sure there will be others > who would be willing to spend some of their time for this cause to > validate claims made by both the communities. We can then publish all > the results so that others can reproduce them. This will be exactly what we need: an open and fair comparison. But the problem is that James doesn't want any comparisons. He doesn't consider them important. Only personality of the code submitter is important for James. Vlad -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
