On Thu, 18 Nov 2010, Russell King wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 09:49:29PM +0100, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > @@ -617,10 +623,10 @@ static int scsi_try_bus_device_reset(struct scsi_cmnd *scmd)
> >
> > static int __scsi_try_to_abort_cmd(struct scsi_cmnd *scmd)
> > {
> > - if (!scmd->device->host->hostt->eh_abort_handler)
> > - return FAILED;
> > -
> > - return scmd->device->host->hostt->eh_abort_handler(scmd);
> > + struct scsi_host_template *hostt = scmd->device->host->hostt;
> > + if (!hostt->eh_abort_handler)
> > + return FAILED;
> > + return hostt->eh_abort_handler(scmd);
>
> Not that I have much to do with SCSI anymore... I spotted the above.
> Is there any particular reason for using spaces to indent here rather
> than our usual tabs?
>
No. That was me and Emacs having a slight disagreement (see the mail I
just sent)...
--
Jesper Juhl <jj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> http://www.chaosbits.net/
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
