Moger, Babu wrote: > Agree.. But this may not fix the problem completely.. Please see my > comments below.. Also copied Chandra if he has any comments.. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: linux-scsi-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-scsi- > > owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Hillf Danton > > Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 7:34 AM > > To: linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: [PATCH] fix kzalloc in scsi device handler > > > > They look like typo, since there are four instances of kzalloc almost > > typed by the same finger. > > > > The pointer is replaced with a struct, which helps kzalloc return > > correct result. > > > > thanks for any comment on the possibility that mem overflow could > > happen. > > > > Signed-off-by: Hillf Danton <dhillf@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > > > --- a/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_alua.c 2010-11-01 > > 19:54:12.000000000 +0800 > > +++ b/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_alua.c 2010-11-16 > > 20:40:36.000000000 +0800 > > @@ -759,7 +759,7 @@ static int alua_bus_attach(struct scsi_d > > > > unsigned long flags; > > int err = SCSI_DH_OK; > > > > - scsi_dh_data = kzalloc(sizeof(struct scsi_device_handler *) > > + scsi_dh_data = kzalloc(sizeof(struct scsi_dh_data) > > > > + sizeof(*h) , GFP_KERNEL); > > I think this should be like this below. > > scsi_dh_data = kzalloc(sizeof(struct scsi_dh_data) > + sizeof(struct alua_dh_data) , GFP_KERNEL); How about kzalloc(sizeof(*scsi_dh_data) + sizeof(*h), GFP_KERNEL)? Eike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.