Re: Full hostlock pushdown available

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 15:06 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > OK, so can you post an actual diff?  It obviously has to be done in one
> > > commit rather than the 87 you have.
> > > 
> > 
> > So it appears this series will still need the atomic_add_return() usage
> > in scsi_cmd_get_serial() and drop host_lock usage from those LLDs that
> > we know can be converted to 'host_lock-less', yes..?
> 
> Yes that is correct. The series is just a dumb push down, no additional
> improvements (except some very minor ones).  These patches
> are still needed in addition, so it would be just a base for it
> 
> Also James if you use the patch and don't pull 
> please regenerate it from the git tree (or tell me to send it again) -- 
> i did some fixes based on feedback.

You can separate the Doc commits, but the lock pushdown still has to be
a single commit for bisectability.  If you respin the patch, I can add
the description if you want.

James


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux