On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 20:43 +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
> There seems info should get freed when error encountered.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hillf Danton <dhillf@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> --- a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_lport.c 2010-09-13 07:07:38.000000000 +0800
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_lport.c 2010-10-27 20:35:10.000000000 +0800
> @@ -1707,8 +1707,10 @@ static int fc_lport_els_request(struct f
> info->sg = job->reply_payload.sg_list;
>
> if (!lport->tt.exch_seq_send(lport, fp, fc_lport_bsg_resp,
> - NULL, info, tov))
> + NULL, info, tov)) {
> + kfree(info);
The same comment I made about patch [1/2] applies here. We need the BSG
info in the fc_lport_bsg_resp response handler.
Thanks, //Rob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
