On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 23:50 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > > To put this upstream, I need the single commit (with changelog and > > signoff). Otherwise the series won't bisect. Murphys law says that if > > I apply an unbisectable series like this, all the kernel bisections in > > the next few months will end up in here, and I'll take a huge amount of > > flack ... > > I expect even without the locking it should be safe enough for a bisect > test. Not for production of course. And most drivers don't really > need the lock anyways so they are safe in any case. > > An alternative would be to use a different lock around the call > temporary during the series and drop it again at the end. > Mmmmmm, I don't really have an perference here. Unless we want to agree to follow Boaz's recommendation from this morning: http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=128826469826164&w=2 --nab -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
