Re: [PATCH] Check return value of fc_block_scsi_eh()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/13/2010 06:42 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:

fc_block_scsi_eh() might return with status FAST_IO_FAIL
indicating I/O has been terminated due to fast_io_fail timeout.
In this case the rport is still blocked, so any error recovery
will be failing on this port.
Hence each driver needs to check if the return value from
fc_block_scsi_eh() is something other than SUCCESS, in which
case it should just return with that status.
And we need to update the error handler to deal with a
status of FAST_IO_FAIL, too.
And fc_block_scsi_eh() should return SUCCESS on success,
not 0. Otherwise the calling routine will become confused
when reusing that value.


Is this patch supposed to fix the problem I described or is there more patches to follow or do you think I am being too paranoid? It seems the patch alone is going to make the problem worse in the drivers you are speeding up failure in. In the drivers now checking fc_block_scsi_eh and returning when fast io fail is returned then the scsi eh scsi_eh_flush_done_q's scsi_finish_command/scsi_queue_insert processing is going to get done faster and more likely to conflict with the termiante_rport_io callback processing, right?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux