[patch] gdth: integer overflow in ioctl

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



gdth_ioctl_alloc() takes the size variable as an int.
copy_from_user() takes the size variable as an unsigned long.
gen.data_len and gen.sense_len are unsigned longs.
On x86_64 longs are 64 bit and ints are 32 bit.

We could pass in a very large number and the allocation would truncate
the size to 32 bits and allocate a small buffer.  Then when we do the
copy_from_user(), it would result in a memory corruption.

CC: stable@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@xxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/gdth.c b/drivers/scsi/gdth.c
index b860d65..4cf7ffa 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/gdth.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/gdth.c
@@ -4175,6 +4175,14 @@ static int ioc_general(void __user *arg, char *cmnd)
     ha = gdth_find_ha(gen.ionode);
     if (!ha)
         return -EFAULT;
+
+    if (gen.data_len > INT_MAX)
+        return -EINVAL;
+    if (gen.sense_len > INT_MAX)
+        return -EINVAL;
+    if (gen.data_len + gen.sense_len > INT_MAX)
+        return -EINVAL;
+
     if (gen.data_len + gen.sense_len != 0) {
         if (!(buf = gdth_ioctl_alloc(ha, gen.data_len + gen.sense_len,
                                      FALSE, &paddr)))
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux