Re: [PATCH] tcm: Convert to cpu_relax() for atomic_read() in tight loops

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/09/2010 11:29 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Greetings all,
> 
> This patch converts the following functions from within shutdown and release
> path code to use cpu_relax() instead of msleep() while doing atomic_read() in
> a tight loop waiting for various PR and MIB reference count(s) to return to zero:
> 
> 	*) core_update_device_list_for_node() + struct se_dev_entry->pr_ref_count
> 	*) core_release_port() + struct se_port->sep_tg_pt_ref_cnt
> 	*) se_dev_stop() + struct se_hba->dev_mib_access_count
> 	*) __core_scsi3_free_registration() + struct t10_pr_registration->pr_res_holders
> 	*) core_tpg_wait_for_nacl_pr_ref() + struct se_node_acl->acl_pr_ref_count
> 	*) core_tpg_wait_for_mib_ref() + struct se_node_acl->mib_ref_count
> 	*) core_tpg_deregister() + struct se_portal_group->tpg_pr_ref_count
> 	*) transport_deregister_session() + struct se_session->mib_ref_count
> 
> Thanks to Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk for mentioning cpu_relax() usage!
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas A. Bellinger <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/target/target_core_device.c    |    6 +++---
>  drivers/target/target_core_pr.c        |    2 +-
>  drivers/target/target_core_tpg.c       |    6 +++---
>  drivers/target/target_core_transport.c |    2 +-
>  4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_device.c b/drivers/target/target_core_device.c
> index 665b8e2..459f0f8 100644
> --- a/drivers/target/target_core_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_device.c
> @@ -532,7 +532,7 @@ int core_update_device_list_for_node(
>  	 */
>  	spin_unlock_irq(&nacl->device_list_lock);
>  	while (atomic_read(&deve->pr_ref_count) != 0)
> -		msleep(100);
> +		cpu_relax();
>  	spin_lock_irq(&nacl->device_list_lock);
>  	/*
>  	 * Disable struct se_dev_entry LUN ACL mapping

Why would you want to convert those to busy-waiting? This should rather
be converted to wait_event/wake_up, right?

thanks,
-- 
js
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux