On Mon, 6 Sep 2010, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
So at this point, I will once again to refrain from any non technical
interaction with yourself. If you have geninue concerns about any of
the TCM/LIO v4 code, then I suggest that you and your devels make them
known from within threads containing [PATCH] and [RFC] tags, because I
will not be bothering with anything that does not contain comments on
creating new or improving existing design and code.
I haven't seen any techinical discussion from you either.
all I see is how your favorite has been blessed as being the next thing to
be included, even though it still needs work and Vlad's can't even be
looked at.
that's hardly a technical discussion.
Vlad seems to be trying to document features of the different options,
naturally he knows his option better than anyone else's. He offered to
correct his listing with any information provided by anyone else, and
instead of corrections to the feature lists, we just got accusations of
handwaving and a reiteration that your favorite was selected in some
meeting to be merged.
I would like to point out that over the years there have been many things
that were expected to be merged that didn't get merged. Don't take any
statement in any meeting to be a final decision. It doesn't matter how
promising yourcode looked at that point in time, until it's merged you may
find that it doesn't get merged. And even after it gets merged, if someone
else has better code, their code may replace yours if the other code is
better.
As a user, I would sure like to see more information about the two major
choices and a lot less "this is what was picked at an invitation-only
meeting where one option wasn't represented"
David Lang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
