On Sun, Sep 05, 2010 at 02:50:47PM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > So as to the specifics about why git is really the only right SCM choice > for mainline target mode maintainership, it really all comes down to > workflow. Does your SCM allow other people to easily and without-pain > track your upstream subsystem tree changes and 'rebase' as necessary for > their patch series you make improvements..? If we are talking about > say, a single standalone driver being developed against mainline, then > sure using a SCM like CVS or SVN is perfectly acceptable when you push > to someone upstream like gregkh or akpm via email patch attachments. I actually use git to manage my quilt patch tree so that others can work with me. Don't confuse a scm with a patch management tool, they are two vastly different things and have no relation to each other here. And this sub-topic has NOTHING to do with the main issue here, so I don't know why you are arguing over it. Please take it elsewhere. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
