On Sun, 2010-09-05 at 22:38 -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 05, 2010 at 10:21:20PM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > On Sun, 2010-09-05 at 22:17 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Sun, Sep 05, 2010 at 10:08:16PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Sep 05, 2010 at 02:51:19PM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > > > > On Sun, 2010-09-05 at 13:30 -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > > > > On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 02:23:23AM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > +static void tcm_loop_primary_release(struct device *dev)
> > > > > > > +{
> > > > > > > + return;
> > > > > > > +}
> > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > +static struct device tcm_loop_primary = {
> > > > > > > + .init_name = "tcm_loop_0",
> > > > > > > + .release = tcm_loop_primary_release,
> > > > > > > +};
> > > > > > > +
> > > > > >
> > > > > > No, you can not have statically allocated devices and dummy release
> > > > > > functions.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Last time I checked this is still what mainline
> > > > > drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c is doing for struct device pseudo_primary:
> > > > >
> > > > > static void pseudo_0_release(struct device *dev)
> > > > > {
> > > > > if (SCSI_DEBUG_OPT_NOISE & scsi_debug_opts)
> > > > > printk(KERN_INFO "scsi_debug: pseudo_0_release() called\n");
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > static struct device pseudo_primary = {
> > > > > .init_name = "pseudo_0",
> > > > > .release = pseudo_0_release,
> > > > > };
> > > > >
> > > > > so for these type of things in TCM_Loop I tend to follow what scsi_debug does,
> > > > > so I don't exactly see a issue here atm. Anybody else have comments..?
> > > >
> > > > The kobject embedded in the device structure is refcounted and it's
> > > > lifetime may be different from lifetime of your module. If somebody
> > > > happen to hold reference to the driver while your module is being
> > > > unloaded bad things will happen.
> > > >
> > > > I am sure Greg has something on this topic ready for cut-and-paste.
> > >
> > > Documentation/kobject.txt :)
> >
> > I still don't get it..? Does this mean that scsi_debug and TCM_Loop are
> > currently broken wrt to this item or not..?
> >
>
> Yes they are broken.
Hi Dmitry and Greg,
Would you mind giving a bit more specific idea as to what a patch to fix
this issue would involve for an emulated struct device usage..? I would
be happy to generate patches for scsi_debug and TCM_loop to resolve this
issue, but I need a bit more information what I should be looking at.
Thanks,
--nab
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
