Matthew Wilcox, on 08/24/2010 06:55 PM wrote:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 06:43:29PM +0400, Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote:
Also it looks very suspicious why nobody even tried to match that
Microsoft/Intel record, even Intel itself who closely works with Linux
community in the storage area and could do it using the same hardware.
You seem to be under the impression that "Intel" is some monolithic
entity. Despite working with six different storage& performance
groups within Intel, I have no idea what record you're referring to,
nor what hardware it was accomplished with.
It is
http://communities.intel.com/community/wired/blog/2010/04/22/1-million-iops-how-about-125-million
Even if I did, I wouldn't
know which group within Intel to contact to see if they still have
the setup. Then I'd have to convince them that it's in their interest
to try to replicate this on Linux. And I'd have to be prepared to sink
a considerable quantity of my time into it ... which I don't have.
Sorry if it looked like I was blaming you. I just was wondering why
Intel developed Linux drivers for those network adapters and isn't
interested to similarly demonstrate their performance on Linux.
Vlad
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
