Gennadiy Nerubayev, on 08/23/2010 02:10 AM wrote:
I'm not sure if I understand why there is a need for a replacement target to reuse existing code, and would definitely appreciate a brief explanation or a pointer to an earlier one. But even that aside, I'm curious if the criteria for what a replacement target must have for (at least potential) inclusion into the kernel were ever clearly outlined in the past. If they were, then there probably would have been things like interested contenders, deadlines, feature comparisons, code reviews, and so on, right?
A fair public review of SCST code with a fair _public_ comparison without any deals and conspiracy behind our back is, basically, all we are asking. Let the best code win.
Vlad -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
