Ok, pls ignore my first question: I was trying to access https://lwn.net/Articles/399148/ But I just read: http://lwn.net/Articles/400589/ Chetan --- On Wed, 8/18/10, Chetan Loke <generationgnu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Chetan Loke <generationgnu@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [Scst-devel] Fwd: Re: linuxcon 2010... > To: "Vladislav Bolkhovitin" <vst@xxxxxxxx>, "James Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxx> > Cc: "scst-devel" <scst-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Date: Wednesday, August 18, 2010, 2:58 PM > Hello James and others, > > --- On Tue, 8/17/10, James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxx> > > Subject: Re: [Scst-devel] Fwd: Re: linuxcon 2010... > > To: "Vladislav Bolkhovitin" <vst@xxxxxxxx> > > Cc: "scst-devel" <scst-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, > linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, > linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Date: Tuesday, August 17, 2010, 8:30 PM > > On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 20:20 +0400, > > Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote: > > > Hello James, > > > > > > Could you comment rumors that decision about > future > > Linux SCSI target > > > subsystem is done as well as other related > rumors: > > > > If this is related to LSF, the notes on the I/O track > are > > here: > > > > http://lwn.net/Articles/400491/ > > > During the open panel, my question was really specific - > > Q) What is the future of a SCSI-target subsystem in linux. > Which > target engine/subsystem can we expect? > > Your answer) There is place for only 1 target-subsystem in > the Linux scsi stack and in the LSF summit the decision was > taken to merge LIO. Has that > decision changed since the summit? > > As a scst-user what I would like to understand is, what was > that decision based on? Because the LSF summit was 'small by > invitation' only summit. The notes don't give us an insight > on the selection criteria/merits etc. > > > > > > > 3. I have heard you said "Vlad wasn't comfortable > in > > handing up the > > > control to the maintainers ... (this is how > kernel.org > > works)." I have > > > no idea what you meant. I have never been asked > about > > anything like > > > that, so I couldn't say anyhow that I'm not > > comfortable with anything. > > > Could you clarify that? > > > > > 3) above is something that I emailed Vlad and the scst > community based on our offline conversation after the open > panel. If SCST really has licensing issues then I will > personally stop using SCST. Since Vlad hasn't > expressed any concerns on the above and neither have you > commented on it, is it safe to assume that the licensing > requirement is a non-issue? > > > Chetan Loke > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by > > Make an app they can't live without > Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge > http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Scst-devel mailing list > Scst-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scst-devel > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
