On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 06:23:55PM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote: > Yeap, agreed. I couldn't really understand why the the sequence > needed to be atomic for ide in the first place so just left it alone. > Do you understand why it tried to be atomic? I think initial drafs of the barrier specification talked about atomic sequences. Except for that I can't think of any reason. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
