Re: [PATCH 02/11] block: kill QUEUE_ORDERED_BY_TAG

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Tejun,

Tejun Heo, on 08/12/2010 04:41 PM wrote:
Nobody is making meaningful use of ORDERED_BY_TAG now and queue
draining for barrier requests will be removed soon which will render
the advantage of tag ordering moot.

Have you seen Hannes Reinecke's and my measurements in http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=128110662528485&w=2 and http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=128111995217405&w=2 correspondingly?

If yes, what else evidences do you need to see that the tag ordering is a big performance win?

Vlad
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux