Hi James, On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 15:14:02 -0500 James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 15:59 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > > >Yikes. Last minute change, eh? > > > > > > I do not know what you mean. The patches always had iscsi_boot_sysfs in > > > the firmware dir. You mean this is a last minute change? > > > > Yes, this rename. > > > > > > > > > > >>interface is generic and should be used on any arch and with anything > > > >>(ibft or iscsi driver) that wants to export iscsi boot info. The > > > >>attached patch moves iscsi_boot_sysfs to drivers/scsi. It was made over > > > >>linux-next. I have only compile tested it. > > > > > > > >did you compile test it with the x86 native iBFT driver? > > > > > > Yes. > > > > Excellent. The patch does not look like it has changed at all, so: > > > > 1). Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@xxxxxxxxxx> > > for the removal from firmware/ibft, and > > 2). Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@xxxxxxxxxx> for the > > the part that puts in drivers/scsi and will make it now under James' > > mainternship. > > > > James, > > > > I've asked Linus to pull my iBFT tree before yours as there was this > > dependency. Are you OK putting this patch in your tree, or would you prefer > > that I expunge Mike's patch from mine? > > I can put this patch into my post merge tree. I suspect you having a > post-post-merge tree (needed for the build problems) might be a bit > overkill ... Ping? -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Attachment:
pgpzls0l6LhaC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
