Re: [RFC 1/2] block: implement an unprep function corresponding directly to prep

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "Jens" == Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

Jens> On 30/06/10 19.01, James Bottomley wrote:
>> So this is more directly what I'm thinking.  It gives us an exactly
>> correct place to hang the discard allocation in SCSI.  The next patch
>> shows a potential implementation in sd.
>> 
>> I think it should avoid all the leaks people have been seeing trying
>> to move the discard allocation/free into scsi.  I also think it
>> should facilitate sending discard through SCSI as a REQ_TYPE_FS.

Jens> This is so much better than the other hacks, thanks for doing
Jens> this.

Agreed!

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux