[patch 1/3] zfcp: Fix check whether unchained ct_els is possible

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Swen Schillig <swen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

A false check was performed whether an unchained ct_els 
is possible or not.

Signed-off-by: Swen Schillig <swen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Christof Schmitt <christof.schmitt@xxxxxxxxxx>
---

 drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c	2010-06-21 09:37:39.000000000 +0200
+++ b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c	2010-06-21 09:37:40.000000000 +0200
@@ -981,7 +981,7 @@ static int zfcp_fsf_setup_ct_els_sbals(s
 	}
 
 	/* use single, unchained SBAL if it can hold the request */
-	if (zfcp_qdio_sg_one_sbale(sg_req) || zfcp_qdio_sg_one_sbale(sg_resp)) {
+	if (zfcp_qdio_sg_one_sbale(sg_req) && zfcp_qdio_sg_one_sbale(sg_resp)) {
 		zfcp_fsf_setup_ct_els_unchained(adapter->qdio, &req->qdio_req,
 						sg_req, sg_resp);
 		return 0;

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux