Re: spinlock recursion in scsi_end_request() (kernel 2.6.24)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 8:59 PM, James Bottomley
<James.Bottomley@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 17:05 +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On 05/20/2010 01:33 PM, Prashant wrote:
>> > I have a question related to code which is almost same in the
>> > current kernel.  I don't know whether this is the right mailing list
>> > for the following question.
>>
>> linux-scsi would probably fit better (cc'd).
>>
>> > When a sata drive is unplugged, its corresponding sdev's state is set
>> > to SDEV_OFFLINE. Now if IO requests are still comming on the same device,
>> > They will be killed by calling scsi_kill_request().
>> >
>> > 1) scsi_kill_request does following things:
>> >     i) Unlock request queue
>> >     ii) Increment host_busy count
>> >     iii) Lock request queue
>> >     iv) Calls __scsi_done()
>> >
>> > 2) __scsi_done() does following things:
>> >      i) set request completion data
>> >      ii) Calls blk_completion_request()
>> >
>> > 3) blk_completion_request() does following things:
>> >      i) Adds request->donelist to blk_cpu_done softirq queue
>> >         and raise the softirq (which is scsi_softirq_done)
>> >
>> > 4) next sequence is:
>> >     scsi_softirq_done >> scsi_finish_command >> scsi_device_unbusy()
>> >
>> > 5) scsi_device_unbusy() again locks the request_queue. This is the place where
>> >     we can get into the spinlock recursion.
>> >
>> >     Is this correct? Please correct me if something is wrong.
>>
>> Raising softirq defers the work to another context and grabbing the
>> same lock from softirq handler doesn't constitute a recursive locking.
>> Please try to reproduce the problem on recent kernel w/ lockdep
>> enabled.
>
> Just to confirm what Tejun says: the design of the cmd -> done (i.e.
> scsi_done) going through the block sofirq handler is specifically so it
> can be called either locked or unlocked, so this can never be a
> recursion.
>
> James
>
Thanks for the explanation. I will let you know if this problem is reproduced
with the latest kernel.

Thanks,
Prashant
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux