On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 04:12 -0700, Rajashekhara, Mahesh wrote: This subject line [PATCH X/5] AACRAID driver update isn't descriptive of the patch ... I interpolated proper subject lines from the description. > ObligatoryDisclaimer: Please accept my condolences regarding Outlook's > handling of patch attachments (inline gets damaged, please use > attachment). The inline seemed to work mostly (lucky, because there are no attachments). > diff -ru a/drivers/scsi/aacraid/aacraid.h b/drivers/scsi/aacraid/aacraid.h > --- a/drivers/scsi/aacraid/aacraid.h 2010-05-13 12:35:40.020534512 -0700 > +++ b/drivers/scsi/aacraid/aacraid.h 2010-05-13 12:37:21.823058176 -0700 > @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ > *----------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ > > #ifndef AAC_DRIVER_BUILD > -# define AAC_DRIVER_BUILD 24702 All of your patches remove this same version number. That makes each of the patches after the first reject here when applied in sequence. I just stripped this out and updated the version number in the final patch. James -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
