On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 07:07 -0700, Sean Thomson wrote: > This is mostly a curiosity question, but who is maintaining libsas? There's no overall maintainer, it's jointly maintained by its users. > I'm just starting work on a new sas driver and wondering if it is > necessary for anything to be done to make it (or if it is already) 2.1 > compliant I don't quite understand the question. libsas is a software library and 2.1 is a physical layer document ... there's not much overlap. To answer what I think the question is about, libsas is only coded to 1.1 ... the expander checking has been relaxed a bit, so it shouldn't barf on a 2.0 configuration, but I'm not aware that anyone's actually tested it with a self configuring expander. James [Jack]We had test it on PMC-Sierra's SAS2 expanders, the main issue is expander checking as you mentioned, and we can remove the the T-T limitation in function sas_check_parent_topology. The other problem is zone support, when we change zone setting, the libsas can not find the change. I'm not have much time to dig in. Thanks -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
