RE: [patch] pm8001: potential null dereference inpm8001_dev_gone_notify()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In the original code we dereferenced "pm8001_dev" before checking if it 
was null.  This patch moves the dereference inside the condition.

This was found by a static checker (smatch).  I looked, but I couldn't 
tell if "pm8001_dev" dev was ever actually null.  The approach in this 
patch seemed like the safest response.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@xxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.c
b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.c
index bff4f51..cd02cea 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.c
@@ -885,11 +885,13 @@ static void pm8001_dev_gone_notify(struct
domain_device *dev)
 	u32 tag;
 	struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha;
 	struct pm8001_device *pm8001_dev = dev->lldd_dev;
-	u32 device_id = pm8001_dev->device_id;
+
 	pm8001_ha = pm8001_find_ha_by_dev(dev);
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&pm8001_ha->lock, flags);
 	pm8001_tag_alloc(pm8001_ha, &tag);
 	if (pm8001_dev) {
+		u32 device_id = pm8001_dev->device_id;
+
 		PM8001_DISC_DBG(pm8001_ha,
 			pm8001_printk("found dev[%d:%x] is gone.\n",
 			pm8001_dev->device_id, pm8001_dev->dev_type));


[Jack] Acked-by: Jack Wang <jack_wang@xxxxxxxxx>
Thanks!

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux