[PATCH 9/11] drivers/scsi: Correct NULL test

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Julia Lawall <julia@xxxxxxx>

fcf is tested in the line just below, so the first test is not needed.

A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)

// <smpl>
@r@
expression *x;
expression e;
identifier l;
@@

if (x == NULL || ...) {
    ... when forall
    return ...; }
... when != goto l;
    when != x = e
    when != &x
*x == NULL
// </smpl>

Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@xxxxxxx>

---
 drivers/scsi/fcoe/libfcoe.c         |    2 --
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/fcoe/libfcoe.c b/drivers/scsi/fcoe/libfcoe.c
index 9823291..9b634bd 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/fcoe/libfcoe.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/fcoe/libfcoe.c
@@ -941,8 +941,6 @@ static void fcoe_ctlr_recv_clr_vlink(struct fcoe_ctlr *fip,
 	u32	desc_mask;
 
 	LIBFCOE_FIP_DBG(fip, "Clear Virtual Link received\n");
-	if (!fcf)
-		return;
 	if (!fcf || !fc_host_port_id(lport->host))
 		return;
 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux